VolcanoStories Gr&Y

Ask the Researchers and Editors of VolcanoStories about their work!

🇪🇸¿Quieres leer el foro volcanoStories en español?🇮🇨 Puedes usar la función de traducción automática de Google Chrome

🇪🇸 ¿Quieres hacer una pregunta en español? 🇮🇨 Entre los investigadores de VolcanoStories de GeoTenerife hay canarios e investigadores bilingües. Estaremos encantados de conversar tanto en español como en inglés.

Want to join the debate? Our forum is a space for questions, reflections and comments. We encourage frank and open debate to foment a thoughtful and constructive discussion. This is an honest endeavour to continue a helpful dialogue and enable ongoing local concerns in particular to be heard. Comments on this Forum are monitored before being shared. Please note that we delete posts that use inappropriate language, contain personal attacks or that are posted from anonymous accounts.

Forum Navigation

Why was information only published after the eruption?

Quote

Why didn't they tell us all the truth about the 2021 eruption at the time and only publish things later?

~ Resident Question, 26th June 2025

Quote

Sometimes when scientific papers are published after an event it’s because researchers have been able to piece things together using new data they collected after the eruption started. This is called Hindcasting.

Hindcasting (or retrospectively forecasting an event after the fact), is a common technique used by volcanologists. It can be used to identify monitoring signals that could, looking back, help to identify the start of the event, its end, or the style of an eruption using new information available. It is time-consuming to pick through the new data to identify signals which could help to forecast future events. So although we know more about Tajogaite volcano now, this research was not available at the time to help inform Palmeros.

From the 2021 La Palma eruption, we investigate four publications that shed new light on the eruption using hindcasting. Two of these (satellite gas and ground deformation data) are used to hindcast the end of the eruption, by analysing how their values decreased throughout the eruption.

The other two identify new evidence of magma movement prior to the eruption. A petrological study (rock analysis) identifies a reactivation of the system 10-15 years before the eruption, whilst a seismic study identifies rapid upwards magma movement days before the eruption.

All of the studies provide valuable analysis which may be useful in understanding future eruptions on La Palma.

Eruptions can be hotbeds for new discoveries, but the rush to publish should go hand in hand with outreach. Effective communication to affected communities is key to put these findings in context and avoid causing distress or confusion locally.

You can read our full report in English or Spanish in our Opinion Pieces here: https://geotenerife.com/hindsight-is-20-20/

~ GeoTenerife Team